4.7 Article

Synergistic effects of combining ozonation, ceramic membrane filtration and biologically active carbon filtration for wastewater reclamation

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Volume 382, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121091

Keywords

Wastewater reclamation; Ceramic membrane; Ozonation; Biologically active carbon (BAC); Membrane fouling

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51761125013]
  2. Committee of Science and Technology Innovation of Shenzhen [JCYJ20170817161942307, KQJSCX20180320171226768]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, we proposed to apply an integrated process which is comprised of in situ ozonation, ceramic membrane filtration (CMF) and biologically active carbon (BAC) filtration to wastewater reclamation for indirect potable reuse purpose. A pilot-scale (20 m(3)/d) experiment had been run for ten months to validate the prospect of the process in terms of treatment performance and operational stability. Results showed that the in situ O-3 + CMF + BAC process performed well in pollutant removal, with chemical oxygen demand, ammonia, nitrate nitrogen, total phosphorus and turbidity levels in the treated water being 5.1 +/- 0.9, 0.05 +/- 0.01, 10.5 +/- 0.8, < 0.06 mg/L, and < 0.10 NTU, respectively. Most detected trace organic compounds were degraded by > 96%. This study demonstrated that synergistic effects existed in the in situ O-3 + CMF + BAC process. Compared to pre-ozonation, in situ ozonation in the membrane tank was more effective in controlling membrane fouling (maintaining operational stability) and in degrading organic pollutants, which could be attributed to the higher residual ozone concentration in the tank. Because of the removal of particulate matter by CMF, water head loss of the BAC filter increased slowly and prolonged the backwashing interval to 30 days. BAC filtration was also effective in removing ammonia and N-nitrosodimethylamine from the ozonated water.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available