4.7 Article

Modelling of emerging contaminant removal during heterogeneous catalytic ozonation using chemical kinetic approaches

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Volume 380, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.120888

Keywords

Adsorption; Catalytic ozonation; Micropollutant; Model

Funding

  1. NSFC [51878370]
  2. National Special Program of Water Pollution Control and Management [2017ZX07202]
  3. special fund of State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control [18LO1ESPC]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the prediction of emerging contaminant (EC) removal during heterogeneous catalytic ozonation by chemical kinetic models. Six ECs with differing ozone reactivity were spiked in a synthetic water and a groundwater, then treated by conventional ozonation and heterogeneous catalytic ozonation with alpha- or beta-MnO2 catalysts. Results show that catalysts did not considerably influence the removal of ECs with high and intermediate ozone reactivity (diclofenac, gemfibrozil, and bezafibrate), but enhanced the removal efficiencies of ECs with low ozone reactivity (2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, clofibric acid, and ibuprofen) to varied extent ((-)10-30%). The removal efficiencies of ECs could be reasonably predicted using chemical kinetic models based on the ozone (O-3) and hydroxyl radical ((OH)-O-center dot) rate constants of ECs, pseudo-first-order rate constants observed for EC adsorption on the MnO2 catalysts, and O-3 and (OH)-O-center dot exposures observed for catalytic ozonation. Furthermore, the model reveals that ECs are removed mainly by O-3 and/or center dot OH oxidation during heterogeneous catalytic ozonation, while adsorption of ECs on catalysts contributes negligibly. Therefore, the removal efficiencies of ECs could be satisfactorily predicted using a simplified model based only on the O-3 and (OH)-O-center dot rate constant and the O-3 and (OH)-O-center dot exposures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available