4.4 Article

Evaluation of the face advance rate on ground control in the open face area associated with mining operations in Western China

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS AND ENGINEERING
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages 390-398

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jge/gxz124

Keywords

face advance rate; ground control; major roof fall; physical model; strata movement

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51974320, 51904082, 51774884]
  2. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [2204080]
  3. Science and Technology Plan of Beijing Municipal Education Commission [KM202010009001]
  4. North China University of Technology [107051360019XN134/017, 107051360019XN134/020, 110051360002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The modern longwall faces in coal bases in Western China are being mined at an increasingly faster rate, yet the consequences of the face advance rate on the ground control and strata movement require further investigation. In this study, two improved physical models with different advance rates are developed to evaluate the roof failure characteristics; the strata movement; the displacement of the strong, massive roof; and the roof movement velocity. The results show that: (i) regular falls of the immediate roof and major falls of the hard roof are observed with the progressive development of the longwall face. Massive fractures on the roof strata extending from the face to the ground surface develop on a major roof fall. (ii) Model I, which has a slower face advance rate, shows a major roof fall interval of 65 m, which is slightly less than the 70 m found by Model II, which advances at a faster rate. Larger strata fractures are observed in Model I, while the gob area of Model II is better filled with waste rock materials. (iii) The displacement and velocity of the hard roof are unnoticeable until a massive roof fall. Maximum displacement occurs on a major roof fall, which is 50 mm for Model I and 30 mm for Model II. The maximum roof movement velocity on a major roof fall is 4.6 cm per min and 5.9 cm per min for Models I and II, respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available