4.5 Article

Prevalence, intensity and pathology of the nasal parasite Nasicola hogansi in Atlantic bluefin tuna (Thunnus thynnus)

Journal

JOURNAL OF FISH DISEASES
Volume 43, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jfd.13129

Keywords

Atlantic bluefin tuna; epidemiology; Nasicola hogansi; olfaction; pathology

Funding

  1. Cell Signaling Technology
  2. Large Pelagic Research Center's Donor Fund
  3. University of Massachusetts Amherst Natural History Collection
  4. National Science Foundation's Division of Environmental Biology [1112726, 1048523, 1051106]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ectoparasitic flatworms of Nasicola (Monogenoidea: Capsalidae), which infect nasal epithelium of true tunas (Thunnus spp.), are not well studied, nor have their impacts on the host's olfactory organ been evaluated. Infections of Nasicola hogansi on Atlantic bluefin tuna, Thunnus thynnus, were investigated with emphasis on the relationship between infection prevalence, abundance and mean intensity with bluefin tuna size, sex, body condition and capture month, as well as histopathological effects. Commercially caught Atlantic bluefin tuna (n = 161, 185-305 cm curved fork length) from the Gulf of Maine were sampled during June through August 2009 for infections by N. hogansi. A total of 247 specimens of N. hogansi were collected, with a prevalence of 45.3%, mean abundance of 1.57 (CI: 1.21-2.03) and mean intensity of 3.45 (CI: 2.91-4.22). Neither fish sex nor landing month had a significant effect on parasite parameters. Larger and better-conditioned Atlantic bluefin tuna had a higher mean intensity of infection. Pathology associated with infection by N. hogansi included extensive necrosis, sloughing of the nasal epithelium and associated inflammation of underlying connective tissues. Further epidemiological and pathological study of this host-parasite system is warranted since impaired olfaction, if present, could adversely affect spawning and migration of this top ocean predator.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available