4.7 Article

A wish list for synthetic biology in photosynthesis research

Journal

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY
Volume 71, Issue 7, Pages 2219-2225

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/eraa075

Keywords

Artificial photosynthesis; carboxysome; C-4 engineering; fluorescence marker proteins; natural variation; photosynthesis; synthetic biology

Categories

Funding

  1. Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB27020105]
  2. Chinese National Science Foundation [31870214]
  3. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1172157]
  4. Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Translational Photosynthesis [CE140100015]
  5. European Union Europe Aid SEW-REAP project
  6. BBSRC [BB/N013662/1, BB/N016009/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This perspective summarizes the presentations and discussions at the ' International Symposium on Synthetic Biology in Photosynthesis Research', which was held in Shanghai in 2018. Leveraging the current advanced understanding of photosynthetic systems, the symposium brain-stormed about the redesign and engineering of photosynthetic systems for translational goals and evaluated available new technologies/tools for synthetic biology as well as technological obstacles and new tools that would be needed to overcome them. Four major research areas for redesigning photosynthesis were identified: (i) mining natural variations of photosynthesis; (ii) coordinating photosynthesis with pathways utilizing photosynthate; (iii) reconstruction of highly efficient photosynthetic systems in non-host species; and (iv) development of new photosynthetic systems that do not exist in nature. To expedite photosynthesis synthetic biology research, an array of new technologies and community resources need to be developed, which include expanded modelling capacities, molecular engineering toolboxes, model species, and phenotyping tools.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available