4.7 Article

Moderate water stress in rice induces rhizosheath formation associated with abscisic acid and auxin responses

Journal

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY
Volume 71, Issue 9, Pages 2740-2751

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/eraa021

Keywords

ABA; auxin; moderate water stress; rhizosheath formation; root growth; root hair

Categories

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFE0118100]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31761130073, 31422047, 31872169, 31770123, 31901428]
  3. Newton Advanced Fellowship [NSFC-RS: NA160430]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The rhizosheath is known to be beneficial for drought resistance in many plants, but the regulation of rhizosheath formation in rice plants is unclear. Here, we investigate rhizosheath formation in different rice varieties and root hair mutants. Our results showed that moderate water stress in rice induced rhizosheath formation. The soil porosity and water content were higher in the rice rhizosheath than in the rice bulk soil under moderate water stress. Additionally, rhizosheath formation in short root hair mutants was lower than in wild-type rice under moderate water stress. Moreover, transcriptomic results indicated that abscisic acid (ABA) and auxin were involved in root and root hair responses in rhizosheath formation. Further, blocking ABA and auxin pathways in wild type and in rhl1-1, the shortest root hair mutant, rhizosheath formation and root hair length were significantly decreased under moderate water stress. However, wild type plants maintained a higher root ABA content, root basipetal auxin transport, root hair length, and amount of rhizosheath than did rhl1-1. Our results suggest that moderate water stress in rice induces rhizosheath formation by modulating the ABA and auxin responses to regulate root and root hair growth, which may be used to breed rice varieties resistant to drought.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available