4.7 Article

Mutations of two FERONIA-like receptor genes enhance rice blast resistance without growth penalty

Journal

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY
Volume 71, Issue 6, Pages 2112-2126

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erz541

Keywords

FERONIA; FLR; Magnaporthe oryzae; rice; reactive oxygen species (ROS); stress responses

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC-31871396, 31400232, 31571444]
  2. Hunan Provincial Science & Technology funds [2015JJ3048, 2017RS3053]
  3. Young Elite Scientist Sponsorship Program by CAST [YESS20160001]
  4. Science and Technology Project of Changsha [KQ1706017]
  5. Hunan Technology Major Project [2018NK1020]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Genes that provide resistance to fungi and/or bacteria usually reduce plant growth and ultimately affect grain yield. Thus, crop breeding programs need to find genetic resources that balance disease resistance with growth. The receptor kinase FERONIA regulates cell growth and survival in Arabidopsis. Here, we investigate, in rice, the role of members of the FERONIA-like receptor (FLR) gene family in the balance between growth and the response to the fungal pathogen Magnaporthe oryzae (Pyricularia oryzae), which causes the most devastating disease in rice. We carried out genome-wide gene expression and functional screenings in rice via a gene knockout strategy, and we successfully knocked out 14 FLR genes in rice. Using these genetic resources, we found that mutations in the FLR2 and FLR11 genes provide resistance to rice blast without a profound growth penalty. Detailed analyses revealed that FLR2 mutation increased both defense-related gene expression and M. oryzae-triggered production of reactive oxygen species. Thus, our results highlight novel genetic tools for studying the underlying molecular mechanisms of enhancing disease resistance without growth penalty.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available