4.5 Article

Effect of Repairing Endodontic Access Cavities on Survival of Single Crowns and Retainer Restorations

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS
Volume 46, Issue 3, Pages 376-382

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2019.11.012

Keywords

Composite; endodontic treatment; repair; retreatment; survival

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: This retrospective study aimed to analyze the effect of repairing endodontic access cavities with composite on the survival of single crowns and retainer restorations of fixed or removable dental prostheses. Methods: Dental records of patients attending a university dental clinic were retrospectively screened for single crowns and retainer restorations receiving endodontic treatment after crown placement. Survival (no further intervention) and failure (removal, loss or replacement of crown, replacement of access restoration, or recementation of restoration) of crowns and retainers with repaired endodontic access cavities were recorded. The mean annual failure rates were calculated, and the effect of individual-, tooth-, and restoration-related variables on survival was assessed by univariate log-rank tests and multivariate Cox regression analyses with shared frailty (P < .05). Results: One hundred eighty repaired crowns/retainers placed in 151 patients were included (4.5 +/- 3.3 years follow-up). Survival after 2, 5, 7, and 10 years amounted to 82.7%, 71.5%, 67.3%, and 48.8% (mean annual failure rate = 9.0%, 6.5%, 5.5%, and 6.9%), respectively. Although tooth type, kind of restoration, endodontic irrigant, repair conditioning methods, and kind of composite affected survival in the univariate regression analyses, only the kind of restoration (single crown vs retainer restoration) remained significant in the multivariate Cox regression model. Conclusions: Repairing endodontic access cavities with composite increases the longevity of single crowns and retainer restorations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available