4.1 Article

Prognostic significance of the frontal QRS-T angle in patients with AL cardiac amyloidosis

Journal

JOURNAL OF ELECTROCARDIOLOGY
Volume 59, Issue -, Pages 122-125

Publisher

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE INC MEDICAL PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2020.02.001

Keywords

QRS-T angle; Amyloidosis; Outcome

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: Cardiac involvement is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in primary light chain (AL) amyloidosis. The electrocardiographic spatial QRS-T angle reflects changes in the direction of the repolarization sequence and is a powerful predictor of outcome in patients with heart failure. We examined the significance of the frontal QRS-T angle in predicting the clinical outcome in patients with AL cardiac amyloidosis. Methods: Forty-three consecutive patients with cardiac involvement of AL amyloidosis were studied. Patients were followed for survival. Results: Patient median age was 62 years, 56% were males. After a median follow up of 56 months, 16 out of 43 patients had died (37%). The median QRS-T angle was 102 degrees (interquartile range 35-148). QRS-T angle>102 degrees was associated with increased prevalence of lambda free light chain disease and the presence of a pleural effusion. It was also associated with increased interventricular septum thickness, smaller left ventricle end-diastolic diameter, echocardiographic myocardial sparkling texture, pericardial effusion, elevated NT-Pro-BNP and increased restrictive physiology evident by increased E/A and E/e`. A QRS-T angle>102 degrees was a significant predictor of increased mortality by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis (71.6 +/- 11.1% vs. 45.7 +/- 11.1%, P =.02). AQRS-T angle>102 degrees was an independent predictor of mortality by Cox regression analysis (HR 3.00, 95% CI 1.01-8.89, P <.05). Conclusions: The QRS-T angle is associated with indices of advanced amyloid disease and is an independent predictor of survival. (c) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available