4.5 Article

Cytotoxic effects of gemcitabine-loaded solid lipid nanoparticles in pancreatic cancer cells

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jddst.2019.101374

Keywords

Gemcitabine; Solid lipid nanoparticle; Primary pancreatic cancer; Spheroids; In-vitro release kinetics

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute (NCI) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) [U54CA233396-01, 5P20CA192990-04]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the cytotoxic effects of gemcitabine-loaded solid lipid nanoparticle (Gem-SLN) on the patient-derived primary pancreatic cancer cell lines (PPCL-46) and MiaPaCa-2 pancreatic cancer cells. Different SLN formulations were prepared from glyceryl monostearate (GMS), polysorbate 80 (Tween (R) 80) and poloxamer 188 (Pol 188) as surfactants using a cold homogenization method. Gem-SLN was characterized for particle size and charge distribution, entrapment efficiency and loading capacity. Fourier Transform Infra-Red (FTIR) spectroscopy was used to verify Gem and SLN interaction while differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) was used to acquire thermodynamic information on Gem-SLN. Cytotoxicity studies was conducted on PPCL-46 cells and MiaPaCa-2 cells. Among the different Gem-SLN formulations prepared, Gem-SLN15 was selected based on entrapment efficiency (EE) of Gem, loading efficiency of Gem, cytotoxicity and rate of Gem release. Cytotoxic effect of Gem-SLN15-treated PPCL-46 culture (IC50 (2D) = 27 +/- 5 mu M; IC50 (3D) = 66 +/- 2 mu M) was remarkably higher than gemcitabine hydrochloride (GemHCl)-treated PPCL-46 culture (IC50 (2D) = 126 +/- 3 mu M; IC50 (3D) = 241 +/- 3 mu M). Similar trend of higher Gem-SLN15 inhibition in MiaPaCa-2 culture was found (IC50 (2D) = 56 +/- 16 mu M; IC50 (3D) = 127 +/- 4 mu M) compared with GemHCl-treated Mia-PaCa-2 culture (IC50 (2D) = 188 +/- 46 mu M; IC50 (3D) = 254 +/- 52 mu M). Overall, Gem-SLN15 proved to be more effective against PPCL_46 and Mia-PaCa-2 cells than GemHCl treated PPCL-46 and Mia-PaCa-2 cancer cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available