4.3 Review

Effectiveness of platelet rich plasma in burn wound healing: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal

JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGICAL TREATMENT
Volume 33, Issue 1, Pages 131-137

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09546634.2020.1729949

Keywords

Burn wound; platelet-rich plasma; healing; epithelialization

Categories

Funding

  1. youth science fund of Heilongjiang province [QC2016101]
  2. Harbin technological innovative personnel and special fund project, China [2016RAQXJ159, 2016RAXYJ069]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This literature review found that platelet-rich plasma (PRP) treatment for burn wounds can improve healing rate and scar assessment score, but there were no significant differences in graft take, epithelialization, incidence of adverse events, and incidence of infection between PRP-treated and control wound areas.
Background: To evaluate the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in the treatment of burn wounds. Methods: A comprehensive literature survey was conducted in electronic medical journal databases to identify studies that examined the effect of PRP treatment to burn wounds and meta-analyses of mean differences (MD) standardized MD, or odds ratios were performed. Results: The percentage of graft take was not significantly different between PRP-treated and control wound areas. Healing rate was significantly better in PRP-treated wounds. Healing time was also significantly less in PRP-treated wounds. There was no significant difference between PRP-treated and control wound areas in epithelialization or in the incidence of adverse events. Incidence of infection was also not different between PRP-treated and control wound areas. Scar assessment score was significantly better in PRP-treated than in control wound areas. Conclusion: PRP treatment to burn wounds is found to improve healing. Variations in study design and sample size, types of wounds, PRP preparation protocols, and high risk of bias in some of the included studies may have impact on these outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available