4.6 Article

Constraints on the growth rate using the observed galaxy power spectrum

Journal

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2019/12/028

Keywords

cosmological parameters from LSS; redshift surveys; power spectrum

Funding

  1. University of Padova under the STARS Grants programme CoG-ITO: Cosmology beyond Gaussianity, Inference, Theory and Observations
  2. South African Radio Astronomy Observatory
  3. National Research Foundation [75415]
  4. UK Science & Technology Facilities Council [ST/N000668/1]
  5. STFC [ST/S000550/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The large-scale structure growth index gamma provides a consistency test of the standard cosmology and is a potential indicator of modified gravity. We investigate the constraints on gamma from next-generation spectroscopic surveys, using the power spectrum that is observed in redshift space, i.e., the angular power spectrum. The angular power spectrum avoids the need for an Alcock-Packzynski correction. It also naturally incorporates cosmic evolution and wide-angle effects, without any approximation. We include the cross-correlations between redshift bins, using a hybrid approximation when the total number of bins is computationally unfeasible. We show that the signal-to-noise on gamma increases as the redshift bin-width is decreased. Shot noise per bin also increases - but this is compensated by the increased number of auto- and cross-spectra. In our forecasts, we marginalise over the amplitude of primordial fluctuations and other standard cosmological parameters, including the dark energy equation of state parameter, as well as the clustering bias. Neglecting cross-bin correlations increases the errors by similar to 40-150%. Using only linear scales, we find that a DESI-like BGS survey and an HI intensity mapping survey with the SKA1 precursor MeerKAT deliver similar errors of similar to 4-6%, while a Euclid-like survey and an SKA1 intensity mapping survey give similar to 3% errors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available