4.4 Article

Quantification of bone marrow fat content using iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least-squares estimation (IDEAL): reproducibility, site variation and correlation with age and menopause

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY
Volume 89, Issue 1065, Pages -

Publisher

BRITISH INST RADIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20150538

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To determine the reproducibility of the quantitative chemical shift-based water-fat separation method with a multiecho gradient echo sequence [iteraterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least-squares estimation quantitation sequence (IDEAL-IQ)] for assessing bone marrow fat fraction (FF); to evaluate variation of FF at different bone sites; and to investigate its association with age and menopause. Methods: 31 consecutive females who underwent pelvic iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least-squares estimation at 3-T MRI were included in this study. Quantitative FF using IDEAL-IQ of four bone sites were analyzed. The coefficients of variance (CV) on each site were evaluated repeatedly 10 times to assess the reproducibility. Correlations between FF and agewere evaluated on each site, and the FFs between pre- and post-menopausal groups were compared. Results: The CV in the quantification of marrow FF ranged from 0.69% to 1.70%. A statistically significant correlation was established between the FF and the age in lumbar vertebral body, ilium and intertrochanteric region of the femur (p < 0.001). The average FF of postmenopausal females was significantly higher than that of pre-menopausal females in these sites (p < 0.05). In the greater trochanter of the femur, there was no significant correlation between FF and age. Conclusion: In vivo IDEAL-IQ would provide reliable quantification of bone marrow fat. Advances in knowledge: IDEAL-IQ is simple to perform in a short time and may be practical for providing information on bone quality in clinical settings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available