4.7 Article

Role of ion exchange membranes and capacitive electrodes in membrane capacitive deionization (MCDI) for CO2 capture

Journal

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
Volume 564, Issue -, Pages 478-490

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2019.12.039

Keywords

Electrochemical carbon capture; MCDI; Carbon electrodes; Donnan model

Funding

  1. Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs
  2. Dutch Ministry of Infrastructure and Environment
  3. Province of Frysl-an
  4. Northern Netherlands Provinces
  5. research theme Sustainable Carbon Cycle

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recently we showed that membrane capacitive deionization (MCDI) can be used to capture CO2, but we found that the performance decreases with decreasing current density. In the present study, we investigate the effect of electrodes and ion exchange membranes by performing experiments with two membranes (CO2-MCDI), with one membrane (cation or anion exchange membrane), and without membranes (CO2-CDI). We find that the anion exchange membrane is essential to keep high CO2 absorption efficiencies (Lambda(a) : n(CO)(2)((g))/n(charge)), while the absorption efficiency of the CO2-CDI cell was lower than expected (Lambda(a) approximate to:0.5 for CO2-MCDI against Lambda(a)approximate to 0.18 for CO2-CDI). Moreover, we theoretically investigate ion adsorption mechanisms in the electrodes by comparing experimental data of a CO2-CDI cell with theoretical results of the classic amphoteric-Donnan model developed for conventional CDI. By comparing the experimental results with the amph-D model, we find that the model overestimates the absorption efficiency in CO2-CDI experiments. To understand this discrepancy, we investigate the effects of other phenomena, i.e., (i) low ion concentration, (ii) passive CO2 absorption, and (iii) the effect of acid-base reactions on the chemical surface charge. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available