4.7 Article

Standard Anthracycline Based Versus Docetaxel-Capecitabine in Early High Clinical and/or Genomic Risk Breast Cancer in the EORTC 10041/BIG 3-04 MINDACT Phase III Trial

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 38, Issue 11, Pages 1186-+

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.19.01371

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. European Commission Framework Programme VI [FP6-LSHC-CT-2004-503426]
  2. Breast Cancer Research Foundation
  3. Novartis
  4. F Hoffman La Roche
  5. Sanofi
  6. Eli Lilly
  7. Veridex
  8. US National Cancer Institute
  9. European Breast Cancer Council-Breast Cancer Working Group
  10. Jacqueline Seroussi Memorial Foundation
  11. Prix Mois du Cancer du Sein
  12. Susan G Komen for the Cure [SG05-0922-02]
  13. Fondation Belge Contre le Cancer [SCIE 2005-27]
  14. Dutch Cancer Society
  15. Netherlands Genomics Initiative-Cancer Genomics Centre
  16. Association Le Cancer du Sein, Parlons-en!
  17. Brussels Breast Cancer Walk-Run
  18. American Women's Club of Brussels
  19. NIF Trust
  20. German Cancer Aid
  21. Grant Simpson Trust
  22. Cancer Research UK
  23. La Ligue Nationale Contre Le Cancer
  24. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Cancer Research Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PURPOSEMINDACT demonstrated that 46% of patients with early breast cancer at high clinical but low genomic risk on the basis of MammaPrint may safely avoid adjuvant chemotherapy. A second random assignment (R-C) compared docetaxel-capecitabine with an anthracycline-based regimen.PATIENTS AND METHODSR-C randomly assigned patients 1:1 between standard anthracycline-based regimens, with or without taxanes (control) and experimental docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) intravenously plus oral capecitabine 825 mg/m(2) two times per day for 14 days (DC) every 3 weeks for 6 cycles. The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary end points included overall survival and safety.RESULTSOf 2,832 patients, 1,301 (45%) were randomly assigned, and 97% complied with R-C assignment. In the control arm, 29.6% only received taxanes (0.5% of N0 patients). DFS events (n = 148) were much less than required (n = 422) as a result of a lower-than-expected accrual and event rate. At 5 years of median follow-up, DFS was not different between DC (n = 652) and control (n = 649; 90.7% [95% CI, 88% to 92.8%] v 88.8% [95% CI, 85.9% to 91.1%]; hazard ratio [HR], 0.83 [95% CI, 0.60 to 1.15]; P = .26). Overall survival (HR, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.54 to 1.53]) and DFS in the clinical high and genomic high-risk subgroup (86.1% v 88.1%; HR, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.58 to 1.21]) were similar in both arms. DC led to more grade 1 neuropathy (27.1% v 11.2%) and more grade 2 hand/foot syndrome (28.5% v 3.3%) and diarrhea (13.7% v 5.8%). Serious cardiac events occurred in 9 patients (control, n = 4; DC, n = 5). Fifty-three patients developed second cancers (control, n = 32; DC, n = 21; leukemia: 2 v 1). Five treatment-related deaths occurred (control, 2 [0.3%]; DC, 3 [0.5%]).CONCLUSIONAlthough underpowered, this second randomization in MINDACT did not show any improvement in outcome or safety with the use of DC compared with anthracycline-based chemotherapy. (c) 2020 by American Society of Clinical Oncology

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available