4.7 Article

Sustainability efficiency assessment of wastewater treatment plants in China: A data envelopment analysis based on cluster benchmarking

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 244, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118729

Keywords

Efficiency assessment; Data envelopment analysis; Cluster benchmarking; Sustainability; Wastewater treatment plant; Slack based measure

Funding

  1. Major Science and Technology Program of China for Water Pollution Control and Treatment from Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China [2017ZX07204001]
  2. Participation in Research Program from Shanghai Jiao Tong University [T160PRP35015]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Quantitative evaluation on the efficiency of wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) is a key issue that needs to be solved. For this purpose, data envelopment analysis (DEA) was employed to establish a comprehensive efficiency evaluation system on WWTPs, including three inputs of operating cost, electricity consumption and labor, three desirable outputs of chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal rate, ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N) removal rate and reclaimed water yield, and one undesirable output of dry sludge yield. 861 WWTPs in China were assessed by a slacked-based DEA model based on cluster benchmarking. The technology gap ratio (TGR) confirmed that large WWTPs operated more efficiently than small ones. The WWTPs had an average efficiency score of 0.611. Among them, 170 samples were relatively efficient with a score of 1, which means these samples could be a benchmark for other inefficient samples. Different degrees of input excesses or output shortfalls existed in 691 inefficient samples and these samples should be the key objects to improve the operational efficiency. Furthermore, through the Kruskal-Wallis test, the influent COD concentration and capacity load rate showed significant effects on the WWTP performance. These findings, derived from a simple but effective framework, have potential value for managers to make decisions. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available