4.5 Article

Conversion of glycerol to dihydroxyacetone over Au catalysts on various supports

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 95, Issue 4, Pages 1153-1162

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jctb.6300

Keywords

glycerol; dihydroxyacetone; Au catalyst; support effects

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21576161, 21862001]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [GK201706011, GK201801010]
  3. Open Foundation of Key Laboratory of Applied Surface and Colloid Chemistry (SNNU), MOE [2018034]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND Glycerol, which is a coproduct of biodiesel production, has been identified as a key platform compound for producing various valuable chemicals. The selective catalytic oxidation of glycerol to dihydroxyacetone is very attractive. RESULTS A series of Au catalysts supported on metallic oxides, i.e. ZnO, CuO, Al2O3, Fe2O3 and NiO, were studied for selective catalytic oxidation of glycerol to dihydroxyacetone under base-free conditions. Among the catalysts, Au/CuO showed the best catalytic activity (glycerol conversion of 89% and dihydroxyacetone selectivity of 82.6% at 80 degrees C under 10 bar of O-2), followed by Au/ZnO >> Au/NiO > Au/Al2O3 approximate to Au/CuO-SD approximate to Au/Fe2O3. The catalytic behaviors of these supported Au catalysts varied depending on the Au particle size, Au oxidation state, Au-support interactions and lattice oxygen reducibility. CONCLUSION The main reasons for the high catalytic activity of Au/CuO are as follows. Firstly, the catalyst has small metallic Au particles, which are more active in cleavage of the secondary C-H bond in glycerol molecules. Secondly, the interactions between Au and CuO facilitate lattice oxygen reduction, and this increases oxygen mobility, which may promote regeneration of Au-support perimeter active sites by gaseous oxygen. (c) 2019 Society of Chemical Industry

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available