4.7 Article

Wettability of ultra-small pores of carbon electrodes by size-asymmetric ionic fluids

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 152, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.5131450

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Fluid Interface Reactions, Structures and Transport (FIRST) Center, an Energy Frontier Research Center - U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science, Office of the Basic Energy Sciences
  2. Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recently, we studied the phase behavior of ionic fluids under confinement using the classical density functional theory within the framework of the restricted primitive model. The theoretical results indicate that narrowing the pore size may lead to a drastic reduction in the electric double layer capacitance, while increasing the surface electrical potential would improve the ionic accessibility of micropores. In this work, we extend the theoretical investigation to systems containing size-asymmetric electrolytes that may exhibit a vapor-liquid like phase transition in the bulk phase. The effects of pore size and surface electric potential on the phase diagram and microscopic structures of the confined electrolytes were studied over a broad range of parameters. We found that decreasing the pore size or increasing the surface potential could destabilize the liquid phase in micropores, and capillary evaporation could occur regardless of the size asymmetry between cations and anions. Compared to that in a symmetric ionic system, the vapor-liquid phase separation is more likely to take place as the size asymmetry becomes more pronounced. The phase transition would alter the accessibility of ions to micropores and lead to coexisting micropores with different surface charge densities as identified by Monte Carlo simulation. Published under license by AIP Publishing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available