4.7 Article

Active diffusion in oocytes nonspecifically centers large objects during prophase I and meiosis I

Journal

JOURNAL OF CELL BIOLOGY
Volume 219, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

ROCKEFELLER UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201908195

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministere de la Recherche
  2. Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-16-CE13]
  3. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-DIVACEN)
  4. Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale Label [DEQ20150331758]
  5. Paris Sciences et Lettres Aux Frontiere des Labex grant (MYOOCYTE)
  6. Inca grant [PLBIO 2016-270-TRAN]
  7. Fondation Bettencourt Schueller
  8. program Investissements d'Avenir [ANR-10-LABX-54, ANR-11-IDEX-0001-02]
  9. European Research Council (PolarizeMe) [CoG 771201]
  10. Israel Science Foundation [580/12]
  11. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (Curie Institute) [14CE11]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nucleus centering in mouse oocytes results from a gradient of actin-positive vesicle activity and is essential for developmental success. Here, we analyze 3D model simulations to demonstrate how a gradient in the persistence of actin-positive vesicles can center objects of different sizes. We test model predictions by tracking the transport of exogenous passive tracers. The gradient of activity induces a centering force, akin to an effective pressure gradient, leading to the centering of oil droplets with velocities comparable to nuclear ones. Simulations and experimental measurements show that passive particles subjected to the gradient exhibit biased diffusion toward the center. Strikingly, we observe that the centering mechanism is maintained in meiosis I despite chromosome movement in the opposite direction; thus, it can counteract a process that specifically off-centers the spindle. In conclusion, our findings reconcile how common molecular players can participate in the two opposing functions of chromosome centering versus off-centering.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available