Journal
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS
Volume 102, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.109550
Keywords
Asymmetric lifting; Musculoskeletal model; Spinal loads; Regression equations; Muscle activities; Subject-specific; Intradiscal pressure
Categories
Funding
- institut de recherche Robert-Sauve en sante et en securite du travail [IRSST-2014-0009]
- fonds de recherche du Quebec en nature et technologies [FRQNT-200564]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Workplace safety assessment, personalized treatment design and back pain prevention programs require accurate subject-specific estimation of spinal loads. Since no noninvasive method can directly estimate spinal loads, easy-to-use regression equations that are constructed based on the results of complex musculoskeletal models appear as viable alternatives. Thus, we aim to develop subject-specific regression equations of L4-L5 and L5-S1 shear and compression forces during various symmetric/asymmetric tasks using a nonlinear personalized finite element musculoskeletal trunk model. Kinematics and electromyography (EMG) activities of 19 young healthy subjects were collected during 64 different symmetric/asymmetric tasks. To investigate the reliability and accuracy of the musculoskeletal model and regression equations, we compared estimated trunk muscle activities and L4-L5 intradiscal pressures (IDPs) respectively with our own electromyography data (EMGs) and reported in vivo pressure measurements. Although in general, six independent rotation components (three trunk T11 rotations and three pelvic S1 rotations) are required to determine kinematics along the spine, only two surrogate variables (trunk flexion and its asymmetric angles) satisfactorily predicted all six rotation components (R-2 > 0.94). Regression equations, developed based on subject-specific inputs, predicted spinal loads in satisfactory agreement with IDP measurements (R-2 = 0.85). Predicted muscle activities in the personalized musculoskeletal models were in moderate to weak agreements with our measured EMGs in 19 participants. Based on dominance analysis, trunk flexion and its asymmetry angle, hand-load weight, hand-load lever arm, and body weight were the most important variables while the effects of body height and sex on spinal loads remained small. Crown Copyright (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available