4.6 Review

Emerging roles for R-loop structures in the management of topological stress

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 295, Issue 14, Pages 4684-4695

Publisher

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.REV119.006364

Keywords

DNA structure; DNA topology; DNA transcription; DNA topoisomerase; chromosomes; gene transcription; genome stability; R-loop; supercoiling; superhelicity; topological stress

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01-GM120607]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

R-loop structures are a prevalent class of alternative non-B DNA structures that form during transcription upon invasion of the DNA template by the nascent RNA. R-loops form universally in the genomes of organisms ranging from bacteriophages, bacteria, and yeasts to plants and animals, including mammals. A growing body of work has linked these structures to both physiological and pathological processes, in particular to genome instability. The rising interest in R-loops is placing new emphasis on understanding the fundamental physicochemical forces driving their formation and stability. Pioneering work in Escherichia coli revealed that DNA topology, in particular negative DNA superhelicity, plays a key role in driving R-loops. A clear role for DNA sequence was later uncovered. Here, we review and synthesize available evidence on the roles of DNA sequence and DNA topology in controlling R-loop formation and stability. Factoring in recent developments in R-loop modeling and single-molecule profiling, we propose a coherent model accounting for the interplay between DNA sequence and DNA topology in driving R-loop structure formation. This model reveals R-loops in a new light as powerful and reversible topological stress relievers, an insight that significantly expands the repertoire of R-loops' potential biological roles under both normal and aberrant conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available