4.6 Article

Plasticization of poly(lactide) with poly(ethylene glycol): Low weight plasticizer vs triblock copolymers. Effect on free volume and barrier properties

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE
Volume 137, Issue 28, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/app.48868

Keywords

biodegradable; membranes; plasticizer

Funding

  1. Basque Country Government [IT-1313-19]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Innovation and Competitiveness MINECO [MAT-2016-78527-P]
  3. European Funding (ERDF)
  4. European Funding (ESF)
  5. Basque Government

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In order to make poly(lactide) (PLA) suitable for food packaging applications, its toughness must be improved. In this work, the plasticization effectiveness of a low-molecular-weight plasticizer and a triblock copolymer are analyzed. For this purpose, PLA is blended with poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) and poly(lactide-ethylene glycol-lactide) (LA-EG-LA) triblock copolymer. The obtained results show that copolymers are more effective, reducing the glass transition temperature of PLA. Although PLA/PEG blends have been widely studied in the literature, the barrier character has not been analyzed, which is of paramount importance for packaging applications. Therefore, the permeability to carbon dioxide, oxygen, and water vapor of PLA/PEG blends has been characterized observing an increase with the incorporation of PEG, which is the expected behavior. However, the incorporation of LA-EG-LA copolymers leads to permeability values that are slightly higher, similar, or even lower than PLA. Furthermore, the free volume of the samples has been analyzed in order to gain a deeper insight on the factors affecting the transport properties. Overall, this works aims to provide a better understanding towards the design of biodegradable packaging with improved properties that could be also extended to other biodegradable polymers. (c) 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2019, 137, 48868.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available