4.7 Article

Bidirectional association between psoriasis and depression: Two longitudinal follow-up studies using a national sample cohort

Journal

JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
Volume 262, Issue -, Pages 126-132

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.10.043

Keywords

Bidirectional association; Depression; Immunity; Inflammation; Psoriasis

Funding

  1. Hallym University Research Fund [NRF-2018-R1D1A1A02085328]
  2. National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Few studies have investigated the bidirectional association between psoriasis and depression. The aim of our study was to identify the association between psoriasis and depression. Methods: Data collected by the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment from 2002 to 2013 were used. In study I, psoriasis patients (n = 10,932) were matched 1:4 with control I group participants. In study II, depression patients (n = 60,383) were matched 1:4 with control II group participants. Matching was performed for age, sex, income, and region of residence. The stratified Cox-proportional hazard model was used to calculate the hazard ratio (HR) with crude and adjusted models. Results: In study I, the adjusted HR for depression was 1.13 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.03-1.24) in the psoriasis group compared to the control I group. In study II, the adjusted HR for depression was 1.11 (95% CI = 1.00-1.22) in the depression group compared to the control II group. In the subgroup analyses, the adjusted HRs for depression were 1.24 (95% CI = 1.00 - 1.53) in females aged < 40 years and 1.31 (95% CI = 1.04 1.66) in males aged >= 60 years. In the subgroup analyses from study II, the adjusted HRs for psoriasis were 1.56 (95% CI = 1.15 - 2.12) in males aged < 40 years and 1.35 (95% CI = 1.04 - 1.75) in males aged >= 60 years. Conclusions: We suggest that psoriasis and depression might have a bidirectional association.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available