4.2 Article

Urinary Tumor Necrosis Factor-Like Weak Inducer of Apoptosis as a Biomarker for Diagnosis and Evaluating Activity in Lupus Nephritis A Meta-analysis

Journal

JCR-JOURNAL OF CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY
Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages 272-277

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/RHU.0000000000001316

Keywords

lupus nephritis; urinary TWEAK; biomarker; meta-analysis

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81573217]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This meta-analysis evaluated the diagnostic value of uTWEAK for lupus nephritis (LN) and found that uTWEAK has moderate sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing and evaluating activity in LN, indicating its potential as a helpful biomarker for LN.
Objective Urinary tumor necrosis factor-like weak inducer of apoptosis (uTWEAK) has been identified as a candidate biomarker for lupus nephritis (LN). However, its diagnostic value remains unclear. This meta-analysis was conducted to comprehensively evaluate the value of uTWEAK for diagnosis and evaluating activity in LN. Methods Medline, Web of Science, Chinese Biomedical Medical, and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure databases were searched to acquire eligible studies published before September 30, 2019. The quality of the studies was evaluated by Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2. Summary receiver operating characteristic curve and area under the curve were applied to summarize the overall diagnostic performances. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were calculated with the fixed-effects model. RevMan 5.3, Stata 12.0, and Meta-disc 1.4 software were used. Results A total of 7 studies were included. Of these, 4 studies were available for comparison between SLE with and without LN, and 3 studies were for active and inactive LN. The total area under the curve was 0.8640, and DOR was 14.89 (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.95-27.86). For LN diagnosis, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and DOR were 0.55 (95% CI, 0.47-0.63), 0.92 (95% CI, 0.86-0.96), and 16.54 (95% CI, 7.57-36.15), respectively. For assessing LN activity, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and DOR were 0.91 (95% CI, 0.82-0.96), 0.70 (95% CI, 0.58-0.81), and 18.45 (95% CI, 7.45-45.87), respectively. Conclusions This meta-analysis indicated that uTWEAK has relatively moderate sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis and evaluating activity in LN, suggesting that uTWEAK can serve as a helpful biomarker for LN.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available