Journal
JAPANESE JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
Volume 64, Issue 1, Pages 28-36Publisher
SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1007/s10384-019-00697-0
Keywords
Long-term results; Focal laser photocoagulation; Photodynamic therapy; Central serous chorioretinopathy; Recurrence
Categories
Funding
- Chungnam National University
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Purpose To evaluate the long-term results of focal laser photocoagulation and photodynamic therapy (PDT) for treatment of central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC). Study design Retrospective chart review. Methods Sixty-two patients with CSC, thirty-three of whom were treated with focal laser photocoagulation, and 29 with PDT and who were followed up for > 6 months, were enrolled. The focal laser was performed at sites of focal leakage (but not subfoveal leaks) shown in fluorescein angiography. PDT was performed at sites of subfoveal or juxtafoveal focal leakage or not definite focal leakages. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), resolution of subretinal fluid (SRF) and recurrence were analyzed. Results The follow-up duration of the focal laser group was 35.2 +/- 22.6 and of the PDT group, 46.4 +/- 21.5 months. Time to resolution of SRF was 1.8 +/- 1.5 months for the focal laser group and 1.2 +/- 0.5 months for the PDT group. SRF was rapidly absorbed in the PDT group. In both groups, the CMT was decreased 1 month after treatment. The BCVA improved significantly 1 month after treatment in the focal laser group and 3 months after treatment in the PDT group. However, there was no significant difference in CMT reduction and BCVA improvement between the two groups. It subsequently remained similar for up to 3 years. Ten patients (30.3%) in the focal laser group and three patients (10%) in the PDT group recurred during the follow-up period. Conclusions PDT showed early resolution of the SRF compared to focal laser. In CSC patients, both the CMT and BCVA remained stable for 3 years after treatment. After 3 or more years of follow-up, PDT showed a lower recurrence rate than focal laser.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available