4.2 Article

The development process of self-acceptance among Chinese women with breast cancer

Journal

JAPAN JOURNAL OF NURSING SCIENCE
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jjns.12308

Keywords

breast cancer; grounded theory; qualitative research; self-acceptance

Categories

Funding

  1. Medical Health Science and Technology Project of Zhejiang Provincial Health Commission [2018KY738]
  2. Zhejiang Province Natural Science Foundation of China, China [LGF18H160020]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of China [2018KY738]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim The development process of self-acceptance in breast cancer survivors is a dynamic process that is poorly understood. The objective of the present study was to explore and delineate the dynamic progression toward self-acceptance in Chinese women with breast cancer. Methods Data were collected through individual in-depth face-to-face interviews with 20 women who had undergone treatment for breast cancer at the breast center in a large tertiary care hospital in Ningbo, China between September 2016 and June 2017. Data analysis occurred through the open, axial, and selective coding stages of grounded theory and used the constant comparative method. Results Based on the interviewer responses, one core category, three categories, and seven subcategories were identified that pertained to the process of self-acceptance in Chinese women with breast cancer. The core category of self-acceptance was normalization, returning to the pre-illness state with an identity and image that conformed to the cultural norm. To reach normalization, women progressed through a crisis stage, a compromise stage, and a managing impressions stage. Conclusion This study proposes that self-acceptance in breast cancer survivors is a dynamic and active process. Findings will inform the development of interventions that will provide structure and support to Chinese women with breast cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available