Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Reviewer-coerced citation: case report, update on journal policy and suggestions for future prevention
Jonathan D. Wren et al.
BIOINFORMATICS (2019)
How to evaluate reviewers - the international orthopedics reviewers score (INOR-RS)
Andreas F. Mavrogenis et al.
INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS (2019)
International Orthopaedics - instructions for authors, English expression, style and rules
Andrew Quaile et al.
INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS (2019)
Reviewers, don’t be rude to nonnative English speakers
Adriana L. Romero-Olivares
SCIENCE (2019)
Rude paper reviews are pervasive and sometimes harmful, study finds
Christie Wilcox
SCIENCE (2019)
Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented groups in STEM
Nyssa J. Silbiger et al.
PEERJ (2019)
Reviews, reviewers and reviewing
Ancuta Zazgyva et al.
INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS (2017)
Stereotype Threat
Steven J. Spencer et al.
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 67 (2016)
Stereotype Threat Impairs Older Adult Driving
Ann E. Lambert et al.
APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY (2016)
Beyond test performance: a broader view of stereotype threat
Neil A. Lewis et al.
CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHOLOGY (2016)
Retrospective analysis of the quality of reports by author-suggested and non-author-suggested reviewers in journals operating on open or single-blind peer review models
Maria K. Kowalczuk et al.
BMJ OPEN (2015)
Is Stereotype Threat a Useful Construct for Organizational Psychology Research and Practice?
Elise K. Kalokerinos et al.
INDUSTRIAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY-PERSPECTIVES ON SCIENCE AND PRACTICE (2014)
Gender differences in evaluation of new business opportunity: A stereotype threat perspective
Vishal K. Gupta et al.
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS VENTURING (2014)
Bias in peer review
Carole J. Lee et al.
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (2013)
Global gender disparities in science
Cassidy R. Sugimoto et al.
NATURE (2013)
The Matilda Effect in Science Communication: An Experiment on Gender Bias in Publication Quality Perceptions and Collaboration Interest
Silvia Knobloch-Westerwick et al.
SCIENCE COMMUNICATION (2013)
The Effects of Stereotypes and Observer Pressure on Athletic Performance
Anne Krendl et al.
JOURNAL OF SPORT & EXERCISE PSYCHOLOGY (2012)
Cooperation between Referees and Authors Increases Peer Review Accuracy
Jeffrey T. Leek et al.
PLOS ONE (2011)
Stereotype Threat and Health Disparities: What Medical Educators and Future Physicians Need to Know
Diana J. Burgess et al.
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE (2010)
Does Stereotype Threat Affect Test Performance of Minorities and Women? A Meta-Analysis of Experimental Evidence
Hannah-Hanh D. Nguyen et al.
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY (2008)
Are reviewers suggested by authors as good as those chosen by editors? Results of a rater-blinded, retrospective study
Elizabeth Wager et al.
BMC MEDICINE (2006)
Differences in review quality and recommendations for publication between peer reviewers suggested by authors or by editors
S Schroter et al.
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2006)
Open peer review: a randomised controlled trial
E Walsh et al.
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY (2000)
Share Paper
