4.4 Article

Self-Contracted Curves in Spaces With Weak Lower Curvature Bound

Journal

INTERNATIONAL MATHEMATICS RESEARCH NOTICES
Volume 2021, Issue 11, Pages 8623-8656

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/imrn/rnz347

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Russian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR) [17-01-00128]
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) [15K04844]
  3. Russian Science Foundation [16-11-10039]
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15K04844] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this article, we show that bounded self-contracted curves are rectifiable in metric spaces with weak lower curvature bound that includes finite-dimensional Alexandrov spaces of curvature bounded below and Berwald spaces of nonnegative flag curvature. Our condition, regarded as a strengthened doubling condition, also holds for certain metric spaces with upper curvature bound. Additionally, we demonstrate the non-embeddability of large snowflakes into metric spaces in the same class, following a strategy previously applied to spaces with upper curvature bound.
We show that bounded self-contracted curves are rectifiable in metric spaces with weak lower curvature bound in a sense we introduce in this article. This class of spaces is wide and includes, for example, finite-dimensional Alexandrov spaces of curvature bounded below and Berwald spaces of nonnegative flag curvature. (To be more precise, our condition is regarded as a strengthened doubling condition and holds also for a certain class of metric spaces with upper curvature bound.) We also provide the non-embeddability of large snowflakes into (balls in) metric spaces in the same class. We follow the strategy of the last author's previous paper based on the small rough angle condition, where spaces with upper curvature bound are considered. Here we apply this strategy to spaces with lower curvature bound.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available