4.4 Article

Anaerobic Threshold Biophysical Characterisation of the Four Swimming Techniques

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE
Volume 41, Issue 5, Pages 318-327

Publisher

GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
DOI: 10.1055/a-0975-9532

Keywords

physiology; biomechanics; biophysics; anaerobic threshold; elite swimmers

Categories

Funding

  1. Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology, I.P. [SFRH/BD/138876/2018, UID/DTP/04045/2019]
  2. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/138876/2018] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The anaerobic threshold (AnT) seems to be not only a physiologic boundary but also a transition after which swimmers technique changes, modifying their biomechanical behaviour. We expanded the AnT concept to a biophysical construct in the four conventional swimming techniques. Seventy-two elite swimmers performed a 5x200 m incremental protocol in their preferred swimming technique (with a 0.05 m center dot s (-1) increase and a 30 s interval between steps). A capillary blood samples were collected from the fingertip and stroke rate (SR) and length (SL) determined for the assessment of [La], SR and SL vs. velocity inflexion points (using the interception of a pair of linear and exponential regression curves). The [La] values at the AnT were 3.3 +/- 1.0, 3.9 +/- 1.1, 2.9 +/- 1 .34 and 4.5 +/- 1.4 mmol center dot l (-1) (mean +/- SD) for front crawl, backstroke, breaststroke and butterfly, and its corresponding velocity correlated highly with those at SR and SL inflection points (r=0.91-0.99, p<0.001). The agreement analyses confirmed that AnT represents a biophysical boundary in the four competitive swimming techniques and can be determined individually using [La] and/or SR/SL. Blood lactate increase speed can help characterise swimmers' anaerobic behaviour after AnT and between competitive swimming techniques.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available