4.2 Article

The influence of Wilms' tumor 1 gene expression level on prognosis and risk stratification of acute promyelocytic leukemia patients

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LABORATORY HEMATOLOGY
Volume 42, Issue 1, Pages 82-87

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ijlh.13144

Keywords

acute promyelocytic leukemia; minimal residual disease; prognosis; WT1 gene expression

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development, Republic of Serbia [III 41004]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction Patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) are characterized by the highest expression of Wilms' tumor 1 (WT1) gene compared with other subtypes of acute myeloid leukemia, and yet this molecular marker is almost never used for risk stratification and in therapy response monitoring. Methods Quantitative assessment of Wilms' tumor 1 (WT1) gene transcripts was performed using real-time PCR method. The bone marrow samples were collected at the time of diagnosis for 47 APL patients, and for 31/47 patients during follow-up/relapse of the disease (129 samples in total). We examined how this molecular marker can be used for prognosis and minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring. Results Increased WT1 expression was found in 34% of patients. WT1(high) status was an independent unfavorable factor for early death occurrence and was associated with shorter overall survival (OS). Assessment of log reduction value of WT1 expression in paired diagnosis/complete remission samples did not reveal its impact on relapse rate, disease-free survival, and OS. Also, measurement of WT1 expression level at different time points during therapy was not a reliable method for MRD monitoring. Conclusion Increased expression of WT1 gene detected in high proportion of APL patients could be considered as a marker for more precise risk stratification models in an attempt to further improve treatment and outcome of APL patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available