4.7 Article

Dominant pseudocapacitive lithium storage in the carbon-coated ferric oxide nanoparticles (Fe2O3@C) towards anode materials for lithium-ion batteries

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 45, Issue 15, Pages 8186-8197

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.01.151

Keywords

DC arc plasma; Ferric oxide; Carbon shell; Pseudo-capacitive; Anode; Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs)

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China of China [51331006, 51271044]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A facile strategy of arc plasma followed by an annealing treatment was developed to fabricate the carbon-coated ferric oxide nanoparticles (Fe2O3@C) as the anode materials for LIBs. In the arc-discharge process, higher enthalpy of the plasma was realized by existence of active hydrogen atoms, which can greatly promote the evaporation of raw Fe2O3/solid graphite powers and give rise to the highly graphitized carbon shells. It is indicated that the core/shell nanostructure effectively preserves the structural/electrical integrity leading to the excellent cycling stability. Unlike the carbon coatings formed by wet chemical routes, such carbon layers feature dominant pseudo-capacitive behavior, stronger electric conductivity and better charge transfer ability, thus harvesting the superior rate capability. Benefiting from the structural advantages, the Fe2O3@C electrode delivers a reversible capacity higher than 500 mA h g(-1) at the current density of 5 A g(-1) after 500 cycles. The mechanisms of structural formation and the electrochemical activities have been revealed in details. The facile synthesis route and good electrochemical performances endow the Fe2O3@C nanoparticles with great potential to meet the requirements on high energy/ power and long lifespan for LIBs. (C) 2020 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available