4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Industrial acid mine drainage and municipal wastewater co-treatment by dual-chamber microbial fuel cells

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 45, Issue 26, Pages 13757-13766

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.12.037

Keywords

Bioelectricity; Heavy metal removal; Industrial acid mine drainage; Microbial fuel cell; Wastewater treatment

Funding

  1. Universidad Autonoma de Guerrero

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objective of this study was to evaluate performance of a co-treatment method of industrial acid mine drainage (I-AMD) and municipal wastewater (MWW) by dual-chamber microbial fuel cells (DC-MFC). Sewage sludge and MWW were used as inoculum-fuel in anodic chamber. I-AMD was fed to the cathode side of the chamber. A 100 Omega resistor was used to externally connect the anode to the cathode (DC-MFC-A). A second cell was operated at the open circuit potential (DC-MFC-B). In both cells, the efficiency of organic matter removal was similar to 15% and the wastewater alkalinity was reduced by more than 50% in both cells. On the other hand, the physicochemical characteristics and composition of I-AMD were modified. The pH increased from 2.50 to 4.12 +/- 0.6. The SO42- concentration was reduced ca. 20 and 8% for the DC-MFC-A and DC-MFC-B, respectively. NO3- Concentration decreased in both cells by >90%. Different heavy metals (HMs) and metalloid removal values were observed in the cells: 42, 84, 71, 77, 55 and 42% for Cd, Cu, Fe, Al, Pb and As, respectively. Finally, a maximum volumetric power of 14,000 mW/m(3) was reached by DC-MFC-A. The DC-MFCs achieved simultaneous treatment of MWW, partial neutralization of I-AMD, HMs removal, and bioelectricity generation. Hence, DC-MFCs seem to be an encouraging alternative for bioremediation of both MWW and I-AMD. (C) 2019 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available