4.6 Article

The validated sun exposure questionnaire: association of objective and subjective measures of sun exposure in a Danish population-based sample

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY
Volume 176, Issue 2, Pages 446-456

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bjd.14861

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. TrygFonden
  2. Danish Board of Research and Innovation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Few questionnaires used in monitoring sun-related behaviour have been tested for validity. Objectives We established the criteria validity of a questionnaire developed for monitoring population sun-related behaviour. Methods During May-August 2013, 664 Danes wore a personal electronic ultraviolet radiation (UVR) dosimeter for 1 week that measured their outdoor time and dose of erythemal UVR exposure. In the following week, they answered a questionnaire on their sun-related behaviour in the measurement week. Results Outdoor time measured by dosimetry correlated strongly with both outdoor time and the developed exposure scale measured in the questionnaire. Exposure measured in standard erythema dose (SED) by dosimetry correlated strongly with the exposure scale. In a linear regression model of UVR (SED) received, 41% of the variation was explained by skin type, age, week of participation and exposure scale, with exposure scale as the main contributor. The weekly sunburn fraction correlated strongly with the number of ambient sun hours (r = 0.73, P < 0.001). Conclusions This criteria-validated questionnaire provides evidence of the exposure that the questionnaire aimed to measure. The evidence provided showed a strong link between the objectively measured behaviour and the behaviour measured by this survey construct. The questionnaire is the first validated tool to measure the UVR exposure in a national population-based sample.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available