4.7 Article

Power calculations for cluster randomized trials (CRTs) with right-truncated Poisson-distributed outcomes: a motivating example from a malaria vector control trial

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 49, Issue 3, Pages 954-962

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyz277

Keywords

Truncated outcomes; statistical power; sample size; vector control trial

Funding

  1. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
  2. UK Medical Research Council
  3. Department for International Development
  4. Innovative Vector Control Consortium

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Cluster randomized trials (CRTs) are increasingly used to study the efficacy of interventions targeted at the population level. Formulae exist to calculate sample sizes for CRTs, but they assume that the domain of the outcomes being considered covers the full range of values of the considered distribution. This assumption is frequently incorrect in epidemiological trials in which counts of infection episodes are right-truncated due to practical constraints on the number of times a person can be tested. Methods: Motivated by a malaria vector control trial with right-truncated Poisson-distributed outcomes, we investigated the effect of right-truncation on power using Monte Carlo simulations. Results: The results demonstrate that the adverse impact of right-truncation is directly proportional to the magnitude of the event rate, lambda, with calculations of power being overestimated in instances where right-truncation was not accounted for. The severity of the adverse impact of right-truncation on power was more pronounced when the number of clusters was <= 30 but decreased the further the right-truncation point was from zero. Conclusions: Potential right-truncation should always be accounted for in the calculation of sample size requirements at the study design stage.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available