Journal
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 49, Issue 3, Pages 954-962Publisher
OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyz277
Keywords
Truncated outcomes; statistical power; sample size; vector control trial
Categories
Funding
- Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
- UK Medical Research Council
- Department for International Development
- Innovative Vector Control Consortium
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Background: Cluster randomized trials (CRTs) are increasingly used to study the efficacy of interventions targeted at the population level. Formulae exist to calculate sample sizes for CRTs, but they assume that the domain of the outcomes being considered covers the full range of values of the considered distribution. This assumption is frequently incorrect in epidemiological trials in which counts of infection episodes are right-truncated due to practical constraints on the number of times a person can be tested. Methods: Motivated by a malaria vector control trial with right-truncated Poisson-distributed outcomes, we investigated the effect of right-truncation on power using Monte Carlo simulations. Results: The results demonstrate that the adverse impact of right-truncation is directly proportional to the magnitude of the event rate, lambda, with calculations of power being overestimated in instances where right-truncation was not accounted for. The severity of the adverse impact of right-truncation on power was more pronounced when the number of clusters was <= 30 but decreased the further the right-truncation point was from zero. Conclusions: Potential right-truncation should always be accounted for in the calculation of sample size requirements at the study design stage.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available