4.7 Article

Comparative studies on structure and physiochemical changes of millet starch under microwave and ultrasound at the same power

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.08.218

Keywords

Microwave; Ultrasound; Millet starch; Structure; Physiochemical properties

Funding

  1. Baodi District Industry-University-Research Sci-tech Cooperation Project titled Instant Nutritional Coarse Cereals Powder Processing Technology and Product Development
  2. 2018 Baodi District Agricultural Science and Technology Plan Project (Major project) [201814]
  3. National Engineering Research Center of Pesticides, Nankai University (Tianjin)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

As two novel starch modification technologies, the comparative study between microwave (MC) and ultrasound (UC) is of important significance for their applications. The objective of this work is to compare the changes of millet starch with MC and UC, focusing on the viscosity, swelling power (SP), transparency (TR), short-range molecular order (FT-IR spectrum), thermal properties (DSC), long-range molecular order (X-ray diffraction), in vitro enzymatic digestibility, and morphological properties. MC changed the type of the pasting curves form B-type to C-type, and the maximum decrease of the peak viscosity and relative crystallinity of MC starch was 74.9% and 100%, however, these changes for UC starch were only 14.8% and 23.2%. MC decreased the SP, TR, DSC, and ratio of absorbances at 1047/1022 cm(-1), but UC caused opposite trend of these properties. Both MC and UC increased the in vitro enzymatic digestibility by 26.7% and 13.3%, respectively. MC also destroyed the original appearance of the starch granules and formed smaller and lamellar gel blocks. In conclusion, MC had greater influence on starch structure and properties than UC, even in a short period. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available