4.5 Article

Three-way decision with incomplete information based on similarity and satisfiability

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPROXIMATE REASONING
Volume 120, Issue -, Pages 151-183

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijar.2020.02.005

Keywords

Three-way decision; Rough set; Incomplete information; Similarity; Satisfiability; Fuzzy logic

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61473239, 61976130]
  2. China Scholarship Council [201707000052]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Three-way decision is widely applied with rough set theory to learn classification or decision rules. The approaches dealing with complete information are well established in the literature, including the two complementary computational and conceptual formulations. The computational formulation uses equivalence relations, and the conceptual formulation uses satisfiability of logic formulas. In this paper, based on a brief review of these two formulations, we generalize both formulations into three-way decision with incomplete information that is more practical in real-world applications. For the computational formulation, we propose a new measure of similarity degree of objects as a generalization of equivalence relations. Based on it, we discuss two approaches to three-way decision using alpha-similarity classes and approximability of objects, respectively. For the conceptual formulation, we propose a measure of satisfiability degree of formulas as a quantitative generalization of satisfiability with complete information. Based on it, we study two approaches to three-way decision using alpha-meaning sets of formulas and confidence of formulas, respectively. While using similarity classes is a common method of analyzing incomplete information in the literature, the proposed concept of approximability and the two approaches in conceptual formulation point out new promising directions. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available