4.6 Article

Prognostic value of antibodies to Merkel cell polyomavirus T antigens and VP1 protein in patients with Merkel cell carcinoma

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY
Volume 174, Issue 4, Pages 813-822

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/bjd.14313

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Ligue Contre le Cancer

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV) is the main aetiological agent of Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC). Serum antibodies against the major MCPyV capsid protein (VP1) are detected in the general population, whereas antibodies against MCPyV oncoproteins (T antigens) have been reported specifically in patients with MCC. Objectives The primary aim was to assess whether detection of serum antibodies against MCPyV proteins at baseline was associated with disease outcome in patients with MCC. The secondary aim was to establish whether evolution of these antibodies during follow-up was associated with the course of the disease. Methods Serum T-antigen and VP1 antibodies were assessed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using recombinant proteins in a cohort of 143 patients with MCC, including 84 patients with serum samples available at baseline. Results Low titres of VP1 antibodies at baseline (< 10 000) were significantly and independently associated with increased risk of recurrence [ hazard ratio (HR) 2.71, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.13-6.53, P = 0.026] and death (HR 3.74, 95% CI 1.53-9.18, P = 0.004), whereas T-antigen antibodies were not found to be associated with outcome. VP1 antibodies did not differ between patients in remission and those with recurrence or progression during follow-up. However, T-antigen antibodies were more frequently detected in patients with recurrence or progression at 12 months (P = 0.020) and 24 months (P = 0.016) after diagnosis. Conclusions VP1 antibodies constitute a prognostic marker at baseline, whereas T-antigen antibodies constitute a marker of disease recurrence or progression if detected > 12 months after diagnosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available