Journal
INSURANCE MATHEMATICS & ECONOMICS
Volume 91, Issue -, Pages 144-154Publisher
ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2020.01.004
Keywords
Law-invariance; Inf-convolution; Risk sharing; Cumulative prospect theory; Rank-dependent utility
Categories
Funding
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) [RGPIN-2018-03823, RGPAS-2018-522590]
- Center of Actuarial Excellence Research Grant from the Society of Actuaries, United States
- China Scholarship Council
Ask authors/readers for more resources
We analyze the question of whether the inf-convolution of law-invariant risk functionals (preferences) is still law-invariant. In other words, we try to understand whether the representative economic agent (after risk redistribution) only cares about the distribution of the total risk, assuming all individual agents do so. Although the answer to the above question seems to be affirmative for many examples of commonly used risk functionals in the literature, the situation becomes delicate without assuming specific forms and properties of the individual functionals. We illustrate with examples the surprising fact that the answer to the main question is generally negative, even in an atomless probability space. Furthermore, we establish a few very weak conditions under which the answer becomes positive. These conditions do not require any specific forms or convexity of the risk functionals, and they are the richness of the underlying probability space, and monotonicity or continuity of one of the risk functionals. We provide several examples and counter-examples to discuss the subtlety of the question on law-invariance. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available