4.6 Article

Nutritional quality ofDrosophila melanogasteras factitious prey for rearing the predatory bugOrius majusculus

Journal

INSECT SCIENCE
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages 191-202

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1744-7917.12758

Keywords

Drosophilidae; fitness; Hemiptera; lipid; protein; rearing diet

Categories

Funding

  1. Danish Council for Independent Research [DFF 325 - 4184-00248]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We compare the effect of fruit flies as diet on predators, and find that fruit flies with high protein content provide the best results in terms of mortality and fecundity for predators.
The predatory bug,Orius majusculus(Reuter), is an important predator of thrips commercially produced for augmentative releases using the eggs of the Mediterranean flour mothEphestia kuehniella(Zeller). In this study, we assessed the potential for using frozen adults of fruit flies,Drosophila melanogaster(Meigen), either as nymphal rearing diet or as diet throughout the entire life-cycle. We compared life-history traits and reproduction of predators when fedD. melanogasterwith high lipid body content (lipid-rich) and with high protein body content (protein-rich), using a diet of 100%E. kuehniellaeggs as control. We also analyzed the biochemical composition of both prey and predator in order to assess the nutritional quality of each diet, which partially explained the adequacy of the different diets forO. majusculus. There were significant differences between predators fed the two types ofD. melanogaster, with the protein-rich flies as diet providing the best results in terms of mortality and fecundity. Furthermore, we show that while feedingO. majusculusthroughout their development withD. melanogasterincreases mortality and reduces reproduction, protein-richD. melanogastercan be used as nymphal diet with minimal reduction in reproductivity and minimal increase in mortality.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available