4.7 Article

A validated metabolomic signature for colorectal cancer: exploration of the clinical value of metabolomics

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 115, Issue 7, Pages 848-857

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2016.243

Keywords

colorectal adenocarcinoma; metabolomics profiling; mass spectrometry; cancer biomarker

Categories

Funding

  1. Alberta Cancer Foundation (ACF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Timely diagnosis and classification of colorectal cancer (CRC) are hindered by unsatisfactory clinical assays. Our aim was to construct a blood-based biomarker series using a single assay, suitable for CRC detection, prognostication and staging. Methods: Serum metabolomic profiles of adenoma (N = 31), various stages of CRC (N = 320) and healthy matched controls (N = 254) were analysed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). A diagnostic model for CRC was derived by orthogonal partial least squares-discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) on a training set, and then validated on an independent data set. Metabolomic models suitable for identifying adenoma, poor prognosis stage II CRC and discriminating various stages were generated. Results: A diagnostic signature for CRC with remarkable multivariate performance ((RY)-Y-2 = 0.46, Q(2)Y = 0.39) was constructed, and then validated (sensitivity 85%; specificity 86%). Area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve was 0.91 (95% CI, 0.87-0.96). Adenomas were also detectable ((RY)-Y-2 = 0.35, Q(2)Y = 0.26, internal AUROC = 0.81, 95% CI, 0.70-0.92). Also of particular interest, we identified models that stratified stage II by prognosis, and classified cases by stage. Conclusions: Using a single assay system, a suite of CRC biomarkers based on circulating metabolites enables early detection, prognostication and preliminary staging information. External population-based studies are required to evaluate the repeatability of our findings and to assess the clinical benefits of these biomarkers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available