4.3 Article

TDZ-induced axillary shoot proliferation ofRhododendron mucronulatumTurcz and assessment of clonal fidelity using DNA-based markers and flow cytometry

Journal

IN VITRO CELLULAR & DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY-PLANT
Volume 56, Issue 3, Pages 307-317

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11627-019-10049-9

Keywords

Axillary shoot proliferation; Thidiazuron; Somaclonal variability; Rhododendron mucronulatum

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In order to inducein vitroaxillary shoot proliferation from single-node explants ofRhododendron mucronulatumTurcz., two techniques of thidiazuron (TDZ) application were tested: (i) two-step procedure including cultivation on Anderson medium (AM) supplemented with varying TDZ concentrations (0.1 mu M; 0.25 mu M; 0.5 mu M; 1.0 mu M; 2.5 mu M) for 8 wk followed by cultivation on hormone-free medium (AM0) for 6 wk and (ii) 4-h liquid-pulse treatment with different TDZ concentrations (7.5 mu M, 15.0 mu M, or 30.0 mu M) followed by cultivation on AM0 for 8 wk. The highest number of axillary shoots per explant was achieved with 0.1-mu M TDZ after the two-step procedure. The best response in terms of percent regeneration (87%), shoot length (13 mm), absence of structure anomalies, and the shortest shoot production cycle (8 wk) was obtained with 30.0-mu M TDZ liquid-pulse treatment for 4 h. The clonal fidelity of regenerated shoots was evaluated by random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and inter-simple sequence repeats (ISSR) markers and flow cytometry. Genetic similarity of all regenerants between themselves and with the mother seedlings was 99%. Flow cytometric analysis revealed that all samples studied were diploid. The nuclear DNA content of microshoots obtained under the TDZ treatments varied from 1.26 to 1.32 pg per 2C. There were no significant differences in DNA content among mother seedlings andin vitrodeveloped shoots triggered by 0.1- and 2.5-mu M TDZ nor by those triggered by the 30.0-mu M TDZ pulse treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available