4.7 Article

Clinical impact and network of determinants of tumour necrosis in colorectal cancer

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 114, Issue 12, Pages 1334-1342

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2016.128

Keywords

necrosis; colorectal cancer; prognosis; microvascular density; proliferation rate; infiltrative growth

Categories

Funding

  1. Finnish Medical Foundation
  2. Ida Montin Foundation
  3. Orion Research Foundation
  4. Vatsatautien tutkimussaatio

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The disease outcome in colorectal cancer (CRC) can vary in a wide range within the same tumour stage. The aim of this study was to clarify the prognostic value and the determinants of tumour necrosis in CRC. Methods: The areal proportion (%) of tumour tissue showing coagulative necrosis was evaluated in a cohort of 147 CRC patients and correlated with basic clinicopathological characteristics, microvascular density (MVD), cell proliferation rate, KRAS and BRAF mutations, and survival. To validate the prognostic significance of tumour necrosis, an independent cohort of 418 CRC patients was analysed. Results: Tumour necrosis positively correlated with tumour stage (P = 8.5E - 4)-especially with T class (4.0E - 6)-and inversely correlated with serrated histology (P = 0.014), but did not significantly associate with cell proliferation rate, MVD, and KRAS or BRAF mutation. Abundant (10% or more) tumour necrosis associated with worse disease-free survival independent of stage and other biological or clinicopathological characteristics in both cohorts, and the adverse effect was directly related to its extent. High CD105 MVD was also a stage independent marker for worse disease-free survival. Conclusions: Tumour necrosis percentage is a relevant histomorphological prognostic indicator in CRC. More studies are needed to disclose the mechanisms of tumour necrosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available