4.2 Article

Coronary Artery Heart Disease Prediction: A Comparative Study of Computational Intelligence Techniques

Journal

IETE JOURNAL OF RESEARCH
Volume 68, Issue 4, Pages 2488-2507

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/03772063.2020.1713916

Keywords

Computational intelligence techniques; Coronary artery heart disease; Decision tree; Deep neural network; K-nearest neighbor; Logistic regression; Naive Bayes; Random forest; Support vector machine

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared several computational intelligence techniques for predicting coronary artery heart disease and found that the deep neural network achieved the highest accuracy of 98.15% with sensitivity and precision of 98.67% and 98.01% respectively. This outperformed previous studies in heart disease prediction.
Diseases is an unusual circumstance that affects single or more parts of a human's body. Because of lifestyle and patrimonial, different kinds of disease are increasing day by day. Among all those diseases, heart disease turns out to be the most common disease and the impact of this ailment is dangerous than all other diseases. In this paper, we compared a number of computational intelligence techniques for the prediction of coronary artery heart disease. Seven computational intelligence techniques named as Logistic Regression (LR), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Deep Neural Network (DNN), Decision Tree (DT), Naive Bayes (NB), Random Forest (RF), and K-Nearest Neighbor (K-NN) were applied and a comparative study was drawn. The performance of each technique was evaluated using Statlog and Cleveland heart disease dataset which are retrieved from the UCI machine learning repository database with several evaluation techniques. From the study, it can be carried out that the highest accuracy of 98.15% obtained by deep neural network with sensitivity and precision 98.67% and 98.01% respectively. The outcomes of the study were compared with the outcomes of the state of the art focusing on heart disease prediction that outperforms the previous study.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available