4.7 Article

Prognostic impact of CD44-positive cancer stem-like cells at the invasive front of gastric cancer

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 116, Issue 2, Pages 186-194

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2016.401

Keywords

CD44; cancer stem cells; prognosis; gastrectomy; recurrence; survival

Categories

Funding

  1. JSPS KAKENHI Grant [JP15K10096]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15K10096] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The invasive tumour front may provide prognostic information. We examined the relationship between the presence of cancer stem cells (CSCs) at the invasive tumour front and prognosis in gastric cancer (GC). Methods: CD44 is a CSC marker; accordingly, CD44 standard (CD44s), CD44 variant-6 (CD44v6), and CD44 variant-9 (CD44v9) expression were examined in 123 resected primary GCs and the clinical significance of CSCs at the invasive tumour front was analysed. Results: Thirteen (10.6%), 79 (64.2%), and 47 (38.2%) GCs were CD44s-, CD44v6-, and CD44v9-positive, respectively. Patients with CD44-positive expression at the invasive tumour front had significantly poorer disease-specific survival than those with negative expression (CD44s: P < 0.00001, CD44v6: P = 0.013, CD44v9: P = 0.0002). CD44s expression at the invasive tumour front was an independent prognostic factor in resectable GC patients (hazard ratio = 3.13; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-9.01; P = 0.035) and was significantly associated with peritoneal (P < 0.001), lymphatic (P < 0.001), and haematogenous recurrences (P < 0.008). In addition, the number of CD44 isoforms expressed in cancer cells at the invasive tumour front was associated with patient prognosis. No conventional clinicopathological factors were independently associated with CD44 expression at the invasive tumour front. Conclusions: CD44-positive cancer stem-like cells at the invasive tumour front indicate poor survival and can be a unique biological prognostic factor for GC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available