4.7 Article

Association between prediagnostic glucose, triglycerides, cholesterol and meningioma, and reverse causality

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 115, Issue 1, Pages 108-114

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2016.157

Keywords

AMORIS; cholesterol; diabetes; epidemiology; glucose; meningioma

Categories

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health [R01CA122163]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Although meningioma is a benign tumour, it may cause significant morbidity. Obesity and diabetes are positively associated with meningioma. To evaluate the potential effects of obesity-related prediagnostic glucose, triglycerides and cholesterol on meningioma and of prediagnostic meningioma on these biomarkers, we conducted a cohort study. Methods: We identified 41 355 individuals in the Apolipoprotein MOrtality RISk cohort with values for these biomarkers within 15 years before meningioma diagnosis, death, migration or the end of follow-up. We then estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and their interactions with time and age using Cox regression. Results: Meningioma was diagnosed in 181 women and 115 men whose median follow-up time was 7 years. Fasting serum glucose level was inversely related to meningioma among women (P-trend = 0.0006) but not men (P-trend = 0.24). Prediagnostic diabetes was inversely related to meningioma in both sexes combined (HR = 0.45, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.29-0.71), as was serum cholesterol within the year before diagnosis (HR = 0.50, 95% CI 0.34-0.72). Conclusions: Paradoxically, hyperglycaemia is inversely associated with meningioma in women. This finding does not necessarily negate the positive role of obesity or diabetes in meningioma development; rather, it may indicate that their effects depend on the stage of development. Furthermore, the prediagnostic tumour may reduce serum cholesterol levels.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available