4.7 Article

Integration of Control Design and System Operation of a High Performance Piezo-Actuated Fast Steering Mirror

Journal

IEEE-ASME TRANSACTIONS ON MECHATRONICS
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages 239-247

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TMECH.2019.2959087

Keywords

Fast steering mirror (FSM); Lissajous trajectory; motion control; optimal control; system analysis and design

Funding

  1. Christian Doppler Research Association
  2. Austrian Federal Ministry for Digital and Economic Affairs
  3. National Foundation for Research, Technology and Development
  4. MICRO-EPSILON MESSTECHNIK GmbH Company KG
  5. ATENSOR Engineering and Technology Systems GmbH

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article presents a novel piezo-actuated fast steering mirror (FSM) and focuses on the integration of control design and system operation in order to improve its tracking performance for high-speed scanning. The FSM is centered around a membrane-like flexure design and two pairs of stack actuators operated in a push-pull configuration, employing an optical sensor for position measurement. With the flexure membrane, the first fundamental resonance mode is placed as high as 6.7 kHz, while still enabling an angular range of $\pm$2.4 mrad mechanical. This results in the highest performance metric given by the product of mechanical range times main resonance mode frequency reported for piezo FSMs so far. To improve the tracking performance under high-speed scanning compared to a conventional raster scan operation, an integrated control and trajectory design yields a Lissajous trajectory together with tailored single tone and dual tone feedback controllers. It is demonstrated that in the Lissajous scan case, the rms tracking error can be reduced by one order of magnitude, as compared to the conventional raster scan case with a PI+ controller providing a closed-loop bandwidth of 2.7 kHz.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available