4.7 Article

Cryptographic Attribute-Based Access Control (ABAC) for Secure Decision Making of Dynamic Policy With Multiauthority Attribute Tokens

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RELIABILITY
Volume 68, Issue 4, Pages 1330-1346

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TR.2019.2948713

Keywords

Real-time systems; Decision making; Encryption; Authorization; Access control; attribute Tokens; cryptographic policy; cryptography; reliability; secure decision making

Funding

  1. National Key Technologies R&D Programs of China [2018YFB1402702]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61972032]
  3. China Scholarship Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article aims to establish a cryptographic solution to improve security and reliability of the National Institute of Standards and Technologys attribute-based access control (ABAC) model. By breaking down the existing structure of attribute-based encryption, we propose a new cryptographic ABAC (C-ABAC) framework with dynamic policy authorization and real-time attribute credentials. Moreover, a practical C-ABAC construction is proposed to support provable policy decision making and verifiable attribute Tokens among multiple distributed authorities. In this construction, we develop a concrete approach of generating a cryptographic policy from access control markup language. We also prove that attribute Token has existential unforgeability under chosen-attribute and chosen-nonce attacks, and the cryptographic policy is existentially unforgeable under chosen-object attack. In addition, our C-ABAC construction provides semantic security against chosen-plaintext attack with Token and policy queries under the extended general Diffie-Hellman exponent assumption. Finally, we evaluate the performance of the C-ABAC system according to complexity analysis and experimental results. The results show that the C-ABAC system is reliable and easy to implement.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available