4.3 Article

Characteristics of Plasma Activated Medium Produced by Atmospheric Pressure Helium Plasma Jet and Its Selective Effect on Malignant Melanoma and Normal Fibroblast Cells

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PLASMA SCIENCE
Volume 48, Issue 2, Pages 587-595

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TPS.2020.2965564

Keywords

Atmospheric pressure plasma jet (APPJ); fibroblast; melanoma cells; plasma activated medium (PAM); selective effect

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51677146, 11775175, 51521065]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [300102329301]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The characteristics of plasma activated medium (PAM) and its different effects on cancer and normal cells are a relevant topic of study in the field of plasma medicine. In this study, an atmospheric pressure plasma jet (APPJ) with helium was applied for generating PAM, which was utilized for malignant melanoma (B16) and normal fibroblast (3T3) cell treatment. With the applied peak-peak voltages of 8, 10, and 12 kV, together with the gas flow rates of 1, 2, and 3 L/min, the characteristics of He APPJ and PAM were investigated, respectively. The results showed that compared with the free-standing jet, both the total power that was dissipated into the APPJ device and the emission intensities of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) in the gas phase increased when it interacted with the medium. There were obvious increases of H2O2 and NO2- in PAM with different APPJ activation time of 5, 10, 15, 30, 45, and 60 s. The gas flow rate did not yield significant differences in the concentration of species generated, the applied voltage being a more relevant parameter. Finally, the results of cell viability and cell apoptosis assay indicated that the identical dose PAM had a selective effect on two kinds of nonhomologous cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available