4.7 Article

A Truthful and Efficient Incentive Mechanism for Demand Response in Green Datacenters

Journal

Publisher

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/TPDS.2018.2882174

Keywords

Geo-distributed datacenters; smart grid; demand response; incentive mechanism; distributed algorithm

Funding

  1. National Key Research & Development (RD) Plan [2017YFB1001703]
  2. NSFC [61722206, 61802449, 61761136014, 61520106005]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2017KFKJXX009, 2017LGJC40]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Datacenter demand response is envisioned as a promising tool for mitigating operational stability issues faced by smart grids. It enables significant potentials in peak load reduction and facilitates the incorporation of distributed generation. Monetary refund from the smart grid can also alleviate the cloud's burden in escalating electricity cost. However, the current demand response paradigm is inefficient towards incentivizing a cloud service provider (CSP) that operates geo-distributed datacenters. To incentivize CSP participation, this work presents an auction mechanism that enables smart grids to voluntarily submit bids to the CSP to procure diverse amounts of demand response with different payments. To maximize the social welfare of the auction, the CSP that acts as the auctioneer needs to solve the winner determination problemat large-scale. By applying the proximal Jacobian alternating direction method of multipliers, we propose a distributed algorithm for each datacenter to solve a small-scale problemin a parallel fashion. Desirable properties of the proposed auction, such as social welfare maximization and truthfulness are achieved through Vickrey-Clarke-Groves (VCG) payment. Through extensive evaluations based on real datacenter workload traces and IEEE 14-bus test systems, we demonstrate that our incentive mechanism constitutes a win-win mechanism for both the geo-distributed cloud and the smart grid.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available