4.8 Article

Stretchable e-Skin Patch for Gesture Recognition on the Back of the Hand

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS
Volume 67, Issue 1, Pages 647-657

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2019.2914621

Keywords

Feature selection; gesture recognition; human-computer interaction; skin stretch; soft sensing

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51875347, 51622506]
  2. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [16JC1401000]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Gesture recognition is important for human-computer interaction and a variety of emerging research and commercial areas including virtual and augmented reality. Current approaches typically require sensors to be placed on the forearm, wrist, or directly across finger joints; however, they can be cumbersome or hinder human movement and sensation. In this paper, we introduce a novel approach to recognize hand gestures by estimating skin strain with multiple soft sensors optimally placed across the back of the hand. A pilot study was first conducted by covering the back of the hand with 40 small 2.5 mm reflective markers and using a high-precision camera system to measure skin strain patterns for individual finger movements. Optimal strain locations are then determined and used for sensor placement in a stretchable e-skin patch prototype. Experimental testing is performed to evaluate the stretchable e-skin patch performance in classifying individual finger gestures and American Sign Language 0-9 number gestures. Results showed classification accuracies of 95.3% and 94.4% for finger gestures and American Sign Language 0-9 gestures, respectively. These results demonstrate the feasibility of a stretchable e-skin patch on the back of the hand for hand gesture recognition and their potential to significantly enhance human-computer interaction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available